The prosecution
State prosecutor Dmitry Shokhin of the Prosecutor General's Office asked the court yesterday to sentence Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev to ten years in a minimum security prison. During yesterday's presentations in the Meshchansky District Court in Moscow, the prosecutor analyzed the evidence of their guilt and concluded they were guilty of all crimes imputed to them. However, in the main episode of the case – the acquisition of 20 percent of the shares in OAO Apatit – the prosecutor moved that the accused be exempted from punishment owing to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
The analysis of the evidence did not come easily to prosecutor Dmitry Shokhin, in contrast to a reading of the verdict on the first day of presentations [see yesterday's edition of Kommersant]. He kept looking up from the prepared text and, staring off into the distance, chose his words carefully.
“The uniformity of the fraud committed with the shares of OAO Apatit and the Research Institute of Fertilizers and Insectofungicides engages our attention,” the prosecutor explained. “In both cases, Bank MENATEP president Lebedev signed guarantees for dummy firms on whose behalf the shares of these companies were purchased. Meanwhile, as the accused Khodorkovsky explained, Lebedev did not undertake any actions behind his back.”
“This is crazy,” came a loud whisper from Khodorkovsky's father, Boris Moiseevich, who had come together with Khodorkovsky's mother, Marina Filippovna. Shokhin continued.
“In both cases, employees of Khodorkovsky and Lebedev, posing as managers of the dummy companies, were used in the fraud.”
According to the prosecutor, embezzlement by means of fraud committed with shares of Apatit and Research Institute of Fertilizers and Insectofungicides was planned in MENATEP's investment department. In the prosecutor's opinion, the primary evidence of the accused Khodorkovsky and Lebedev's specific complicity in these crimes is Bank MENATEP's charter, which states that the granting of guarantee responsibility to firms is the competence of the board of directors of this financial institution.
“The chairman of Bank MENATEP's board of directors at that time was Khodorkovsky, and Lebedev was a board member!” the prosecutor intoned solemnly. “Khodorkovsky's position on Bank MENATEP's universalism and near-altruism was spurious from the start. The shares of the privatized companies acquired by the dummy companies were subsequently deposited with the bank.”
“They'll give ten years,” Boris Khodorkovsky whispered; his wife was crying.
Meanwhile, Shokhin proceeded to the episode of YUKOS's tax evasion through dummy companies registered in the special low-tax zone of Lesnoi in Sverdlov Region. This was one of the most difficult moments for the prosecutor. The fact is that, under the law, the manager of a company having the right of first signature on financial documents, as well as the chief accountant, must bear responsibility for such a crime. In his testimony in court, Khodorkovsky said that at the time the alleged criminal acts were committed (1999-2001), he was only a shareholder of the oil company and did not hold any management positions in it. The prosecutor's response was terse.
“The case materials contain documents stating that Khodorkovsky and Lebedev were the principal owners of YUKOS's shares. As a result, they were in fact managers of the oil company.”
Shokhin claimed that Business Oil, Vald Oil, Forest Oil, and Mitra, companies registered in Lesnoi through which, according to the documents, YUKOS sold oil for export, were controlled by Khodorkovsky and Lebedev.
As evidence of this, the prosecutor read a list of internal telephone numbers of YUKOS's Moscow office. The list had been obtained from a server seized by the Prosecutor General's Office in a business center in the village of Zhukovka from an office with a paper sign on the door reading “State Duma Deputy Vladimir Dubov”. The list contained the four-digit telephone numbers of the directors of these companies.
As further evidence of the connection to YUKOS of these four directors of the dummy firms (they are currently under investigation), the prosecutor named a statement of a certain witness Mustafin that these people provided OOO YUKOS Moscow's security department with transcripts of their interrogations at the prosecutor's office.
Then Shokhin paused at the illegal activities of “Khodorkovsky and Lebedev's organized group” involving tax payments with bills in 1999, when this was prohibited under the Tax Code. In this episode, the Moscow Arbitration Court rendered invaluable assistance to the prosecution when it found that YUKOS had “intentionally created the appearance that the companies registered in the special low-tax zone had made a profit for the purposes of tax evasion.” The prosecutor quoted in great detail from the court's decision, which had been added to the criminal case materials.
Proceeding to the episode of tax evasion by the accused as private individuals through two offshore companies on the Isle of Man, the prosecutor produced two contradictory pieces of evidence. In a letter to Lebedev from the issuer of the Visa Gold card, Lebedev was referred to as the head of one of these offshore firms, Status Services Ltd. But in an official document from the Isle of Man, also attached to the case materials, Englishman Philipp Benen is mentioned as the head of Status Services Ltd. However, according to Shokhin, both these documents confirm that the said offshore company with charter capital of “all of two thousand pounds sterling” could not have requested, and paid generously for, the advice of Khodorkovsky, Lebedev, Nevzlin, Brudno, Shakhnovsky, and Kazakov.
The prosecutor finally came to the main point – the question of punishment for the accused.
“Khodorkovsky and Lebedev played an organizing role in the perpetration of the crimes, without the least sign of remorse, and made repeated attempts to pressure witnesses and even judges. And Lebedev repeatedly made insulting remarks to the prosecutor.”
All of this, in the prosecutor's opinion, showed that the accused could not be reformed while at liberty. He asked the court to pronounce both accused guilty of fraud involving the shares of Apatit and to sentence them to nine years each in prison, but to exempt them from punishment as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations. For the remaining crimes, i.e., fraud, failure to execute two court decisions, nonpayment of taxes, embezzlement, and forgery of documents, Khodorkovsky and Lebedev deserved ten years each in a minimum-security facility by means of partial addition of terms (full addition gave 65.5 and 47.5 years, respectively). For the third accused, Andrey Krainov, a former employee of MFO MENATEP, who had “partially repented”, the prosecutor asked for a sentence of five years and six months conditionally for fraud and failure to execute a court decision.
“I was prepared for this,” Khodorkovsky said and smiled politely.
The escorts did not allow Platon Lebedev, standing next to him, to compare notes with others in the court, who were shoved back from the cage.
Representatives of the Federal Tax Service and a civil suit in the case will present their arguments tomorrow, after which a date for the lawyers' presentations will be set.
Ekaterina Zapodinskaia
(From
Kommersant, 3.30.2005)